|
|
@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ format_warning({_Tag, {File, Line}, Msg}, FOpt) when is_list(File), |
|
|
|
%%----- Warnings for general discrepancies ---------------- |
|
|
|
message_to_string({apply, [Args, ArgNs, FailReason, |
|
|
|
SigArgs, SigRet, Contract]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Fun application with arguments ~s ", [Args]) ++ |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Fun application with arguments "?R"~s ", |
|
|
|
[bad_arg(ArgNs, Args)]) ++ |
|
|
|
call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({app_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "The call" ?R " ~s:~s~s " ?BW "requires that" |
|
|
@ -80,37 +81,42 @@ message_to_string({app_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]}) -> |
|
|
|
?R "\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Args, Culprit, ExpectedType, FoundType]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({bin_construction, [Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Binary construction will fail since the ~s field ~s in" |
|
|
|
" segment ~s has type ~s\n", [Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Binary construction will fail since the"?NB" ~s "?BW"field"?R |
|
|
|
" ~s"?BW" in segment"?R" ~s"?BW" has type"?R" ~s\n", |
|
|
|
[Culprit, Size, Seg, Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({call, [M, F, Args, ArgNs, FailReason, |
|
|
|
SigArgs, SigRet, Contract]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "The call" ?R " ~w:~w~s ", [M, F, bad_arg(ArgNs, Args)]) ++ |
|
|
|
call_or_apply_to_string(ArgNs, FailReason, SigArgs, SigRet, Contract); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({call_to_missing, [M, F, A]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Call to missing or unexported function ~w:~w/~w\n", [M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Call to missing or unexported function "?R"~w:~w/~w\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({exact_eq, [Type1, Op, Type2]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The test ~s ~s ~s can never evaluate to 'true'\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" can never evaluate to 'true'\n", |
|
|
|
[Type1, Op, Type2]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({fun_app_args, [Args, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Fun application with arguments ~s will fail" |
|
|
|
" since the function has type ~s\n", [Args, Type]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Fun application with arguments "?R"~s"?BW" will fail" |
|
|
|
" since the function has type "?R"~s\n", [Args, Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({fun_app_no_fun, [Op, Type, Arity]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Fun application will fail since ~s :: ~s" |
|
|
|
" is not a function of arity ~w\n", [Op, Type, Arity]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Fun application will fail since "?R"~s "?BW"::"?R" ~s" |
|
|
|
" is not a function of arity "?R"~w\n", [Op, Type, Arity]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({guard_fail, []}) -> |
|
|
|
?BW "Clause guard cannot succeed.\n" ?R; |
|
|
|
message_to_string({guard_fail, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Guard test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" can never succeed\n", [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Guard test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" can never succeed\n", |
|
|
|
[Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({neg_guard_fail, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Guard test not(~s ~s ~s) can never succeed\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Guard test not("?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW") can never succeed\n", |
|
|
|
[Arg1, Infix, Arg2]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({guard_fail, [Guard, Args]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Guard test ~w~s can never succeed\n", [Guard, Args]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Guard test "?R"~w~s"?BW" can never succeed\n", |
|
|
|
[Guard, Args]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({neg_guard_fail, [Guard, Args]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Guard test not(~w~s) can never succeed\n", [Guard, Args]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Guard test not("?R"~w~s"?BW") can never succeed\n", |
|
|
|
[Guard, Args]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({guard_fail_pat, [Pat, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Clause guard cannot succeed. The ~s was matched" |
|
|
|
" against the type ~s\n", [Pat, Type]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Clause guard cannot succeed. The "?R"~s"?BW" was matched" |
|
|
|
" against the type "?R"~s\n", [Pat, Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({improper_list_constr, [TlType]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Cons will produce an improper list" |
|
|
|
" since its "?NB"2"?R"nd"?BW" argument is"?R" ~s\n", [TlType]); |
|
|
@ -127,17 +133,18 @@ message_to_string({no_return, [Type|Name]}) -> |
|
|
|
both -> NameString ++ ?BW "has no local return\n" ?R |
|
|
|
end; |
|
|
|
message_to_string({record_constr, [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Record construction ~s violates the" |
|
|
|
" declared type of field ~s\n", [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Record construction "?R"~s"?BW" violates the" |
|
|
|
" declared type of field "?R"~s\n", [RecConstr, FieldDiffs]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({record_constr, [Name, Field, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Record construction violates the declared type for #~w{}" |
|
|
|
" since ~s cannot be of type ~s\n", [Name, Field, Type]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Record construction violates the declared type for "?R"#~w{}" ?BW |
|
|
|
" since "?R"~s"?BW" cannot be of type "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[Name, Field, Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({record_matching, [String, Name]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The ~s violates the" |
|
|
|
" declared type for #~w{}\n", [String, Name]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The "?R"~s"?BW" violates the" |
|
|
|
" declared type for "?R"#~w{}\n", [String, Name]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({record_match, [Pat, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Matching of ~s tagged with a record name violates the declared" |
|
|
|
" type of ~s\n", [Pat, Type]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Matching of "?R"~s"?BW" tagged with a record name violates the" |
|
|
|
" declared type of "?R"~s\n", [Pat, Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({pattern_match, [Pat, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The ~s"?BW" can never match the type "?NG"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[bad_pat(Pat), Type]); |
|
|
@ -146,78 +153,79 @@ message_to_string({pattern_match_cov, [Pat, Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
" clauses completely covered the type "?NG"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[bad_pat(Pat), Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({unmatched_return, [Type]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Expression produces a value of type ~s," |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Expression produces a value of type "?R"~s"?BW"," |
|
|
|
" but this value is unmatched\n", [Type]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({unused_fun, [F, A]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Function "?NR"~w/~w"?BW" will never be called\n", [F, A]); |
|
|
|
%%----- Warnings for specs and contracts ------------------- |
|
|
|
message_to_string({contract_diff, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Type specification ~w:~w~s" |
|
|
|
" is not equal to the success typing: ~w:~w~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Type specification "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW |
|
|
|
" is not equal to the success typing: "?R"~w:~w~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({contract_subtype, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Type specification ~w:~w~s" |
|
|
|
" is a subtype of the success typing: ~w:~w~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Type specification "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW |
|
|
|
" is a subtype of the success typing: "?R"~w:~w~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({contract_supertype, [M, F, _A, Contract, Sig]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Type specification ~w:~w~s" |
|
|
|
" is a supertype of the success typing: ~w:~w~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Type specification "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW |
|
|
|
" is a supertype of the success typing: "?R"~w:~w~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Contract, M, F, Sig]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({contract_range, [Contract, M, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The contract ~w:~w~s cannot be right because the inferred" |
|
|
|
" return for ~w~s on line ~w is ~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The contract "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW" cannot be right because the" |
|
|
|
" inferred return for "?R"~w~s"?BW" on line "?R"~w"?BW" is "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Contract, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({invalid_contract, [M, F, A, Sig]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Invalid type specification for function" ?R " ~w:~w/~w." |
|
|
|
?BW " The success typing is" ?R " ~s\n", [M, F, A, Sig]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({extra_range, [M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The specification for ~w:~w/~w states that the function" |
|
|
|
" might also return ~s but the inferred return is ~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The specification for "?R"~w:~w/~w"?BW" states that the function" |
|
|
|
" might also return "?R"~s"?BW" but the inferred return is "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({overlapping_contract, [M, F, A]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Overloaded contract for ~w:~w/~w has overlapping domains;" |
|
|
|
" such contracts are currently unsupported and are simply ignored\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Overloaded contract for "?R"~w:~w/~w"?BW" has overlapping" |
|
|
|
" domains; such contracts are currently unsupported and are simply " |
|
|
|
"ignored\n", [M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({spec_missing_fun, [M, F, A]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Contract for function that does not exist: ~w:~w/~w\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Contract for function that does not exist: "?R"~w:~w/~w\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
%%----- Warnings for opaque type violations ------------------- |
|
|
|
message_to_string({call_with_opaque, [M, F, Args, ArgNs, ExpArgs]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The call ~w:~w~s contains ~s when ~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The call "?R"~w:~w~s"?BW" contains "?R"~s"?BW" when "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Args, form_positions(ArgNs), form_expected(ExpArgs)]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({call_without_opaque, [M, F, Args, [{N,_,_}|_] = ExpectedTriples]}) -> |
|
|
|
format([?BW, "The call", ?R, " ~w:~w~s ", ?BW, "does not have" ?R " ~s\n"], |
|
|
|
[M, F, bad_arg(N, Args), form_expected_without_opaque(ExpectedTriples)]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_eq, [Type, _Op, OpaqueType]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Attempt to test for equality between a term of type ~s" |
|
|
|
" and a term of opaque type ~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Attempt to test for equality between a term of type "?R"~s"?BW |
|
|
|
" and a term of opaque type "?R"~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_guard, [Arg1, Infix, Arg2, ArgNs]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Guard test ~s ~s ~s contains ~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Guard test "?R"~s ~s ~s"?BW" contains "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[Arg1, Infix, Arg2, form_positions(ArgNs)]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_guard, [Guard, Args]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Guard test ~w~s breaks the opaqueness of its argument\n", |
|
|
|
[Guard, Args]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Guard test "?R"~w~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of its" |
|
|
|
" argument\n", [Guard, Args]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_match, [Pat, OpaqueType, OpaqueTerm]}) -> |
|
|
|
Term = if OpaqueType =:= OpaqueTerm -> "the term"; |
|
|
|
true -> OpaqueTerm |
|
|
|
end, |
|
|
|
format("The attempt to match a term of type ~s against the ~s" |
|
|
|
" breaks the opaqueness of ~s\n", [OpaqueType, Pat, Term]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The attempt to match a term of type "?R"~s"?BW" against the" |
|
|
|
?R" ~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[OpaqueType, Pat, Term]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_neq, [Type, _Op, OpaqueType]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Attempt to test for inequality between a term of type ~s" |
|
|
|
" and a term of opaque type ~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Attempt to test for inequality between a term of type "?R"~s" |
|
|
|
?BW" and a term of opaque type "?R"~s\n", [Type, OpaqueType]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_type_test, [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The type test ~s~s breaks the opaqueness of the term ~s~s\n", |
|
|
|
[Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The type test "?R"~s~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of the term " |
|
|
|
?R"~s~s\n", [Fun, Args, Arg, ArgType]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_size, [SizeType, Size]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The size ~s breaks the opaqueness of ~s\n", |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The size "?R"~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of "?R"~s\n", |
|
|
|
[SizeType, Size]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({opaque_call, [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The call ~s:~s~s breaks the opaqueness of the term ~s :: ~s\n", |
|
|
|
[M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The call "?R"~s:~s~s"?BW" breaks the opaqueness of the term"?R |
|
|
|
" ~s :: ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Culprit, OpaqueType]); |
|
|
|
%%----- Warnings for concurrency errors -------------------- |
|
|
|
message_to_string({race_condition, [M, F, Args, Reason]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The call ~w:~w~s ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Reason]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The call "?R"~w:~w~s ~s\n", [M, F, Args, Reason]); |
|
|
|
%%----- Warnings for behaviour errors -------------------- |
|
|
|
message_to_string({callback_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, ST, CT]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The inferred return type of"?R" ~w/~w (~s) "?BW |
|
|
@ -231,27 +239,28 @@ message_to_string({callback_arg_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, N, ST, CT]}) -> |
|
|
|
?BW"behaviour\n", |
|
|
|
[ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({callback_spec_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, ST, CT]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The return type ~s in the specification of ~w/~w is not a" |
|
|
|
" subtype of ~s, which is the expected return type for the" |
|
|
|
" callback of ~w behaviour\n", [ST, F, A, CT, B]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The return type "?R"~s"?BW" in the specification of "?R |
|
|
|
"~w/~w"?BW" is not a subtype of "?R"~s"?BW", which is the expected" |
|
|
|
" return type for the callback of "?R"~w"?BW" behaviour\n", |
|
|
|
[ST, F, A, CT, B]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({callback_spec_arg_type_mismatch, [B, F, A, N, ST, CT]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("The specified type for the ~s argument of ~w/~w (~s) is" |
|
|
|
" not a supertype of ~s, which is expected type for this" |
|
|
|
" argument in the callback of the ~w behaviour\n", |
|
|
|
[ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"The specified type for the "?R"~s"?BW" argument of "?R |
|
|
|
"~w/~w (~s)"?BW" is not a supertype of "?R"~s"?BW", which is" |
|
|
|
" expected type for this argument in the callback of the "?R"~w" |
|
|
|
?BW" behaviour\n", [ordinal(N), F, A, ST, CT, B]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({callback_missing, [B, F, A]}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Undefined callback function ~w/~w (behaviour '~w')\n", |
|
|
|
[F, A, B]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Undefined callback function "?R"~w/~w"?BW" (behaviour " ?R |
|
|
|
"'~w'"?BW")\n",[F, A, B]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({callback_info_missing, [B]}) -> |
|
|
|
format(?BW "Callback info about the " ?NR "~w" ?BW |
|
|
|
" behaviour is not available\n" ?R, [B]); |
|
|
|
%%----- Warnings for unknown functions, types, and behaviours ------------- |
|
|
|
message_to_string({unknown_type, {M, F, A}}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Unknown type ~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Unknown type "?NR"~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({unknown_function, {M, F, A}}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Unknown function ~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Unknown function "?NR"~w:~w/~w", [M, F, A]); |
|
|
|
message_to_string({unknown_behaviour, B}) -> |
|
|
|
format("Unknown behaviour ~w", [B]). |
|
|
|
format(?BW"Unknown behaviour "?NR"~w", [B]). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
%% Auxiliary functions below |
|
|
|