Browse Source

[GRAMMAR] Fixed typos and grammar errors for CONTRIBUTING.md. [skip ci]

pull/1453/head
Andrew McRobb 8 years ago
parent
commit
deb69bc62c
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions
  1. +3
    -3
      CONTRIBUTING.md
  2. +1
    -0
      THANKS

+ 3
- 3
CONTRIBUTING.md View File

@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ $ ./rebar3 ct
``` ```
Most tests are named according to their module name followed by the `_SUITE` Most tests are named according to their module name followed by the `_SUITE`
suffi. Providers are made shorter, such that `rebar_prv_new` is tested in
suffix. Providers are made shorter, such that `rebar_prv_new` is tested in
`rebar_new_SUITE`. `rebar_new_SUITE`.
Most tests in the test suite will rely on calling Rebar3 in its API form, Most tests in the test suite will rely on calling Rebar3 in its API form,
@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ The reviewer may ask you to later squash the commits together to provide
a clean commit history before merging in the feature. a clean commit history before merging in the feature.
It's important to write a proper commit title and description. The commit title It's important to write a proper commit title and description. The commit title
should fir around 50 characters; it is the first line of the commit text. The
should be no more than 50 characters; it is the first line of the commit text. The
second line of the commit text must be left blank. The third line and beyond is second line of the commit text must be left blank. The third line and beyond is
the commit message. You should write a commit message. If you do, wrap all the commit message. You should write a commit message. If you do, wrap all
lines at 72 characters. You should explain what the commit does, what lines at 72 characters. You should explain what the commit does, what
@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ maintainers. When opening a pull request, explain what the patch is doing
and if it makes sense, why the proposed implementation was chosen. and if it makes sense, why the proposed implementation was chosen.
Try to use well-defined commits (one feature per commit) so that reading Try to use well-defined commits (one feature per commit) so that reading
them and testing them is easier for reviewers and while bissecting the code
them and testing them is easier for reviewers and while bisecting the code
base for issues. base for issues.
During the review process, you may be asked to correct or edit a few things During the review process, you may be asked to correct or edit a few things

+ 1
- 0
THANKS View File

@ -138,3 +138,4 @@ Carlos Eduardo de Paula
Derek Brown Derek Brown
Heinz N. Gies Heinz N. Gies
Roberto Aloi Roberto Aloi
Andrew McRobb

Loading…
Cancel
Save